California Case Durable Slate should be afraid of!

View previous topic View next topic Go down

California Case Durable Slate should be afraid of!

Post  notTikk on Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:17 pm

Tikk wrote:Alexander Godelman and Marc Le Shay, two Diskeeper employees (Godelman was CIO and Le Shay hired as the Automation Planning Officer) have filed a complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court alleging that Scientology training was a condition of employment and that their refusal to participate led to their dismissal. According to the complaint, "{t]he working conditions and work environment at DISKEEPER were inextricably intertwined with the Scientology religion such that a non-Scientologist cannot escape constant impositions of said religion."

When Godelman complained that these programs ran counter to his own religious belief (Judaism), former Diskeeper CEO and current Chairman Craig Jensen told Godelman that his attendance at the "training courses" was "not negotiable," adding that Godelman would become more intelligent and his personal life would "improve drastically." Jensen also warned Godelman to not "complain about the process" in emails, which Jensen feared would be "misconstrued" and/or "taken out of context." Le Shay was eventually fired after he refused to attend and participate in a course series entitled "Basic Study Manual" and after Godelman interceded on Le Shay's behalf, Godelman was also terminated.

The complaint alleges five causes of action--three based on Diskeeper's alleged violation of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA): namely, discharge due to religious discrimination, discharge in violation of public policy, retaliation against persons opposing wrongful practices. A fourth cause of action claims that Diskeeper violates California Labor law, which prohibits employers from retaliating against persons refusing to participate in activity which would result in a violation of a federal or state statute or regulation. A fifth cause of action alleges that Diskeeper failed to maintain its statutory obligation to prevent discrimination.

In response to Godelman and Le Shay's 3rd amended complaint, Diskeeper filed a Motion to Strike portions of Plaintiffs' complaint, specifically, Plaintiffs' requested remedy for...

"...prospective injunctive relief in the form of a prohibitory and/or mandatory injunction requiring Defendants to cease, desist and forever refrain from forcing or requiring any employee, as a condition of employment, to study, adopt and/or apply the so-called "Hubbard Management Technology" and/or the related "Hubbard Study Technology" in the workplace, according to proof at trial[.]"

Diskeeper argues in its motion that these injunction requests should be struck from the Complaint because Diskeeper is permitted to introduce religious training in the workplace and therefore any injunction which broadly prohibits religious practice in the workplace is unconstitutional.

It would be helpful at this point to explain the purpose of a motion to strike, which is rarely filed. A party will sometimes move to strike language in a pleading which is scandalous and has no relevance to the complaint or relief requested. Filing a motion to strike is also a useful if one wanted to stall, buy time, or bleed the opposing side of legal fees, because it extends the time to serve an Answer to the Complaint. While Diskeeper's argument may actually have some merit and may ultimately succeed at trial, a motion to strike will likely be viewed by the Court as an improper procedural tool to confront this particular argument. Diskeeper will eventually be permitted to make their argument, but not at this stage of the litigation.

For California law on motions to strike, see the California Code of Civil Procedure 435,436.

What's most notable about Diskeeper's motion, however, is Diskeeper's implicit admission that Hubbard Management and Study Technology are both religious in nature, else why would they advance the argument that Diskeeper has a protected interest in providing religious training to employees? In footnote 4 of the motion, Diskeeper claims that it in no way concedes that Hubbard Management and Study Technology are religious, but to anyone familiar with both Scientology and Hubbard's supposedly secular "technologies," the two brands are basically indistinguishable, and indeed, the establishment of supposedly secular fronts was intended by Hubbard to be a recruiting tool.

It will be interesting to see what happens next but a trial seems likely.

If someone with significant bandwidth could kindly mirror these two PDFs, that would be great, because the below link is merely a free Mediafire account, whose bandwidth will cap at some unknown point in the probably near future.

This post was also posted on my blog and on ARS. I'll keep my blog updated with locations where the files can be found if those who mirror post back here the new locations.

notTikk
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: California Case Durable Slate should be afraid of!

Post  Whanonstler on Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:12 pm

Awesomesauce! I needed an extra *umph* for the net vidya, and here it is! Thanks for the info.

I must be doing something right! Oh, wait, I am! I am fighting an abusive and vile, dangerous and tawdry cult!

Off to research!

_________________
Message to Durable Slate, Scientology

The above is just to let google see it. If you want, spread it around to keep the video on the front page of Google!

Dear Scientologists: your cult is made up of chumps and criminals. Which are you?
avatar
Whanonstler
TubesOrg Commodore

Posts : 882
Join date : 2008-04-02
Location : Trantor

View user profile http://www.youtube.com/Whanonstler

Back to top Go down

Re: California Case Durable Slate should be afraid of!

Post  Happy Cat on Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:34 pm

Delicious.
avatar
Happy Cat
Chalkophile

Posts : 176
Join date : 2008-04-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: California Case Durable Slate should be afraid of!

Post  ChefXenu on Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:35 pm

related links:
Tikk's blog
The complaint
The motion to strike

_________________
REB Slaughter (USN-RET)
SP V - Marcab Mess Saucer Crew 1138, 4th (or 5th) Marcabian Invader Force
http://www.ChefXenu.net
614-321-XENU
avatar
ChefXenu
TubesOrg Commodore

Posts : 711
Join date : 2008-04-01
Location : Columbus, Ohio, USA, Sol-3

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: California Case Durable Slate should be afraid of!

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum